Article guidelines and copyright
Well, folks before you just head up and contribute an article (which is very weclome, but when done right), please take a moment to read our so-simple-to-follow Article Guidelines at article_guidelines (the wiki parser is broken, ATM). One thing that should be clear is the copyright(left) status of the article. Many (or even most) publishers allow fair reproduction of "parts" of their text for "review" purposes only and/or in errata ... In other words, you're allowed to "talk about" parts of the material but you're not allowed to "reproduce" the material with the sole intent of redistribution. One of the guidelines suggests "selecting an open licensing model (Creative
Commons, FDL, OPL, etc) for your articles and
append a note at the end with a link to the license text." (or using the one provided with the material if it's not of your creation). Thanks!
EDIT: Moderation, speak up!
/ahmed






2
Ahmed,
I think we have 2 choices:
What do you think?
Ahmed Hashim
I'd go with the first one..
I'd go with the first one.. and Creative Commons
both
In my opinion, we will make the default license model "Creative Commons" and if anyone will like to choose another license for his/her own writing he/she must mention this.
Also we will have to make vote from this issue, I'll be waiting for other suggestions.
Ahmed Hashim